CH beam splitters replacement
Page 1 of 1
CH beam splitters replacement
In order to relax the depolarization problem due to the CH pick-up beam splitter and make the CH immediately available, yesterday we replaced the pick-up beam splitters of the CH telescope.
The available beam splitters are from ULO Optics, thickness is the same as the replaced II-VI beam splitters, the reflectivity is around 8% (instead
of 15% of II-VI).
The different wedge of the new BS caused misalignement of the beam wrt the AXICON on both benches, that we re-aligned. We also took the chance to do a better centering of the CH wrt to the ring on both benches.
In order to decouple the CH and ring powers, we moved the wave-plates
into their original positions, after the CH pick-up BS.
We re-calibrated the ring powers on both benches.
Pni(W)=5.12*Pr_TCS_NI_Mean-0.243
Pwi(W)=56*Pr_TCS_WI_Mean+0.684
We also calibrated the CH power as a function of the steps. Since the motors do not have end-stops, it is MANDATORY not to exceed
the reported values.
With the present set-up the maximum available power for the NI CH is 40mW and for the WI is 65mW. With 40mW of CH the image of the PC has a low SNR. We show in fig 1 and 2 an example of a previous measurement on the West IM (Logbook entry 21706) taken with 40mW and 80mW respectively, averaged over 10 sec.
Fig 3 and 4 show the rings with CH on for North and West benches respectively.
We found a problem with the North CH stepping
motor, solved by Cavalieri and Nenci (see Logbook
21948).
Next week, the two II-VI beam splitters will be characterized and if necessary they will be put back on the benches.
The available beam splitters are from ULO Optics, thickness is the same as the replaced II-VI beam splitters, the reflectivity is around 8% (instead
of 15% of II-VI).
The different wedge of the new BS caused misalignement of the beam wrt the AXICON on both benches, that we re-aligned. We also took the chance to do a better centering of the CH wrt to the ring on both benches.
In order to decouple the CH and ring powers, we moved the wave-plates
into their original positions, after the CH pick-up BS.
We re-calibrated the ring powers on both benches.
Pni(W)=5.12*Pr_TCS_NI_Mean-0.243
Pwi(W)=56*Pr_TCS_WI_Mean+0.684
We also calibrated the CH power as a function of the steps. Since the motors do not have end-stops, it is MANDATORY not to exceed
the reported values.
With the present set-up the maximum available power for the NI CH is 40mW and for the WI is 65mW. With 40mW of CH the image of the PC has a low SNR. We show in fig 1 and 2 an example of a previous measurement on the West IM (Logbook entry 21706) taken with 40mW and 80mW respectively, averaged over 10 sec.
Fig 3 and 4 show the rings with CH on for North and West benches respectively.
We found a problem with the North CH stepping
motor, solved by Cavalieri and Nenci (see Logbook
21948).
Next week, the two II-VI beam splitters will be characterized and if necessary they will be put back on the benches.
Alessio- Posts : 127
Join date : 2008-11-07
Age : 52
Location : Rome
Similar topics
» CH Beam Splitter Replacement (2)
» NI TCS beam alignment on ITM
» WI TCS beam alignment on ITM
» Beam profiler test
» Wave front distortions with Zemax/2
» NI TCS beam alignment on ITM
» WI TCS beam alignment on ITM
» Beam profiler test
» Wave front distortions with Zemax/2
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|