Polarization vs Rotation of the Beam Splitter (2)
Page 1 of 1
Polarization vs Rotation of the Beam Splitter (2)
As the last topic, we repeat the measure for the Beam Splitter of the II-VI: (see "polarization vs Rotation of the Beam Splitter" topic for details)
1) II-VI S/N 80-138511-01
Plaser = 13,40 W
PingPOL=10.80 W
PsenzaB.S=70 mW
Riflettivity = 16 %
Incidence Angle = 45 °
Plaser = 13,40 W
PingPOL=10.45 W
PsenzaB.S=70 mW
Riflettivity = 20 %
Incidence Angle > 45°
In the following picture the compare of the result:
2) II-VI S/N 80-138511-02
Plaser = 13,20 W
PingPOL=10.58 W
PsenzaB.S=70 mW
Riflettivity = 17 %
Incidence Angle = 45 °
Plaser = 13,1 W
PingPOL=9.24 W
PsenzaB.S=70 mW
Riflettivity = 14 %
Incidence Angle > 45°
In the following picture the compare of the result:
1) II-VI S/N 80-138511-01
Plaser = 13,40 W
PingPOL=10.80 W
PsenzaB.S=70 mW
Riflettivity = 16 %
Incidence Angle = 45 °
Plaser = 13,40 W
PingPOL=10.45 W
PsenzaB.S=70 mW
Riflettivity = 20 %
Incidence Angle > 45°
In the following picture the compare of the result:
2) II-VI S/N 80-138511-02
Plaser = 13,20 W
PingPOL=10.58 W
PsenzaB.S=70 mW
Riflettivity = 17 %
Incidence Angle = 45 °
Plaser = 13,1 W
PingPOL=9.24 W
PsenzaB.S=70 mW
Riflettivity = 14 %
Incidence Angle > 45°
In the following picture the compare of the result:
mdipaolo- Posts : 106
Join date : 2008-11-05
Similar topics
» Polarization vs Rotation of the Beam Splitter
» CH Beam Splitter Replacement (2)
» Lasers and RF drivers update
» Beam Splitter Thermal Analisys Preliminary Results
» NI TCS beam alignment on ITM
» CH Beam Splitter Replacement (2)
» Lasers and RF drivers update
» Beam Splitter Thermal Analisys Preliminary Results
» NI TCS beam alignment on ITM
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|