TCS noise calculations
Page 1 of 1
TCS noise calculations
The heating profile of the AXICON can be fitted with a finction of this kind:
I(r)=2r^2/w1^2*4*(w2^2-r^2)^2/w2^4*exp(-2r^2/w1^2)
with w1=0.099 and w2=0.0048 for our present telescope (see attached plot).
Considering that r^2=x^2+y^2, the above function can be rewritten as:
I(x,y)=8/(w1^2*w2^4)*(w2^4*(x^2+y^2)-2w2^2*(x^2+y^2)^2+(x^2+y^2)^3)*exp(-2(x^2+y^2)/w1^2)
As stated in LIGO-T060224-00-D, to compute the flexural noise it is necessary to consider the first derivative of I(x,y) in x and y. After some algebra (if the calculations are right), I get:
dI/dy=16y/(w1^2*w2^4)*exp(-2(x^2+y^2)/w1^2)*(w2^4-2w2^2*(x^2+y^2)*(2+w2^2/w1^2)+(x^2+y^2)^2*(3+4w2^2/w1^2)-2/w1^2*(x^2+y^2)^3)
but considering that w2^2/w1^2=2.5e-3, we can approximate the above expression to:
dI/dy=16y/(w1^2*w2^4)*exp(-2(x^2+y^2)/w1^2)*(w2^4-4w2^2*(x^2+y^2)+3*(x^2+y^2)^2-2/w1^2*(x^2+y^2)^3)
I(r)=2r^2/w1^2*4*(w2^2-r^2)^2/w2^4*exp(-2r^2/w1^2)
with w1=0.099 and w2=0.0048 for our present telescope (see attached plot).
Considering that r^2=x^2+y^2, the above function can be rewritten as:
I(x,y)=8/(w1^2*w2^4)*(w2^4*(x^2+y^2)-2w2^2*(x^2+y^2)^2+(x^2+y^2)^3)*exp(-2(x^2+y^2)/w1^2)
As stated in LIGO-T060224-00-D, to compute the flexural noise it is necessary to consider the first derivative of I(x,y) in x and y. After some algebra (if the calculations are right), I get:
dI/dy=16y/(w1^2*w2^4)*exp(-2(x^2+y^2)/w1^2)*(w2^4-2w2^2*(x^2+y^2)*(2+w2^2/w1^2)+(x^2+y^2)^2*(3+4w2^2/w1^2)-2/w1^2*(x^2+y^2)^3)
but considering that w2^2/w1^2=2.5e-3, we can approximate the above expression to:
dI/dy=16y/(w1^2*w2^4)*exp(-2(x^2+y^2)/w1^2)*(w2^4-4w2^2*(x^2+y^2)+3*(x^2+y^2)^2-2/w1^2*(x^2+y^2)^3)
Alessio- Posts : 127
Join date : 2008-11-07
Age : 52
Location : Rome
RIN requirements
Using dI/dy found in the previous topic, it is possible to evaluate the RIN requirements in case of direct application of the CO2 beam on the TM.
Applying 10W of CO2 on the HR face requires a RIN better than 5*10-9/Hz1/2 @ 50Hz (see figure below)
While if CO2 beam is applied on both faces of the TM (2.5W on HR and 7.5W on AR faces), the RIN requirement is relaxed to 2*10-8/Hz1/2 @ 50 Hz (see figure below)
Applying 10W of CO2 on the HR face requires a RIN better than 5*10-9/Hz1/2 @ 50Hz (see figure below)
While if CO2 beam is applied on both faces of the TM (2.5W on HR and 7.5W on AR faces), the RIN requirement is relaxed to 2*10-8/Hz1/2 @ 50 Hz (see figure below)
Alessio- Posts : 127
Join date : 2008-11-07
Age : 52
Location : Rome
Similar topics
» PDs dark noise and laser noise
» Low Noise Pre-Amplifier
» Pre-amp Frascati in the laser lab
» WI CO2 laser noise
» Closed loop operation
» Low Noise Pre-Amplifier
» Pre-amp Frascati in the laser lab
» WI CO2 laser noise
» Closed loop operation
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|